After his arrest, Richard Wall, 59, was also found with photos showing the boys – one between the ages of six and ten – posing naked.
Sarah Slater, a prosecutor, told Derby Crown Court how, in 2019, Wall met his 14-year-old victim – a teenager who was questioning his sexuality at the time – on a chat room.
She described how, when the boy – who later admitted to being only 14 – asked Wall “what would you say if I wasn’t legal?” “, The accused replied:” I should be very careful. “
Ms Slater recounted how, after exchanging videos and photos – including one of Wall’s victims nude and having sex – they discussed having “sex”.
She said: “They talked about spending evenings together and what else they could do.”
However, Wall’s predatory behavior was revealed when the victim’s mother contacted the police.
Ms Slater said: ‘His mom was the one who realized something was going on in February 2019 because he got very protective of his phone.
“She saw the messages and was very shocked at their sexual nature, then called the police.”
The court heard that the victim’s family – “devastated” by what had happened – had now removed his phone and lived in fear that he would be exploited again.
Recorder Stuart Sprawson, jailing Wall for 10 months suspended for two years, told the accused he had “exploited” his victim’s vulnerability.
‘Animal’ Chesterfield bouncer head butted town center, court says
He said: “The circumstances that gave rise to your appearance in this court begin at a time when (the victim) was questioned about his sexuality.
“And through that, and as is the modern way, kids his age are starting to explore things on the internet where they should expect to be safe and free from predators.
“He’s almost certainly from what I’ve heard from someone who was confused at the time as to which path he was following and somehow you exploited his vulnerability.”
The judge told Wall his pre-sentence report suggested he was not interested in young children, but added, “I hear this time and time again, over and over, from people in your position.
“And yet, it must be obvious to everyone involved that the only reason you chose to continue this conversation was because you had some interest in children.”
The judge said other images of young children found in Wall’s possession showed him “expanding” his interest in young people.
Justin Ablott, Wall’s defense attorney, told the court his client first came to court at the age of 59 and was “deeply ashamed”.
Mr Ablott added: “He finds it difficult to justify why he behaved the way he did.”
Wall, of Wren Park Close, Mount Pleasant, Belper, admitted having had sexual communication with a child, made an indecent photograph of a child and two counts of possession of indecent photographs of a child.
He was subject to a 10-year Sexual Injury Prevention Order, 30 days of rehabilitation activity and a six-month curfew.